Legal Opinion

State v. Farr

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 27, 1971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLANGrTBY, J.

Defendant appeals from conviction of two counts in one indictment (1) entering a vehicle with intent to steal, OBS 164.330, and (2) grand larceny, OBS 164.310 (1)(a). Both charges grew out of the same transaction in which, defendant was accused of stealing a rifle from a vehicle.

Errors alleged which merit consideration are (1) judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence should have been allowed; (2) conviction could not be valid on both counts; (3) (a) a new trial should have been granted because the rifle was not timely received in evidence, and (b) it, in fact, varied from its description in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. ClipstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. OsterOregon Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  3. State v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  4. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API