State v. Farr
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLANGrTBY, J.
Defendant appeals from conviction of two counts in one indictment (1) entering a vehicle with intent to steal, OBS 164.330, and (2) grand larceny, OBS 164.310 (1)(a). Both charges grew out of the same transaction in which, defendant was accused of stealing a rifle from a vehicle.
Errors alleged which merit consideration are (1) judgment of acquittal for lack of evidence should have been allowed; (2) conviction could not be valid on both counts; (3) (a) a new trial should have been granted because the rifle was not timely received in evidence, and (b) it, in fact, varied from its description in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. WoolardOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. ClipstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. OsterOregon Supreme Court · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. JuryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. WebberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. DownesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.