Legal Opinion

DePriest v. Kooiman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 24, 1966No. Docket 239PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

The plaintiff, Ruth Pay DePriest, was traveling south on M-83 in an automobile driven by her husband toward the intersection of this highway with M-46. Plaintiff’s driver gradually brought his vehicle to a stop at the highway intersection, in obedience to the stop sign accompanied by a flashing red light. At the same time, defendant Dirk Kooiman was driving his automobile west on M-46 at the speed of approximately 50 miles per hour. About 100 yards east of the M-83 intersection, with a yellow flasher facing in his direction, the defendant slowed his speed slightly and continued into the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Hicks v. GillespieMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Stewart v. AmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. DePriest v. KooimanMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Tucker v. GilletteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Eastman v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Love v. BrumleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API