Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Gillespie

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 18, Calendar 46,673PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

We have here a negligence case. It arises out of a collision at the intersection of 2 rural roads. The defendant appeals a jury verdict. (Defendant Robert A. Gillespie is the owner of one car involved in the accident, and is sued both individually and as administrator. We will use the word “defendant,” in the singular, and “defendant’s” car throughout this opinion for purposes of clarity.) Defendant asserts primarily that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

On August 19,1951, plaintiff was driving eastward on Calkins road in Genesee county, Michigan. It was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gleason v. LoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Krause v. RyanMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Gibson v. TraverMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Seabury v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Morton v. PetermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lebel v. SwincickiMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Brubaker v. Glenrock Lodge International Order of Odd FellowsWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  3. McKay v. HargisMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. State v. ArenaHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ohman v. VandawaterMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API