Legal Opinion
Alonzo v. New Mexico Employment Security Department
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided October 12, 1984No. 14942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SOSA, Senior Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant Mary Seeley Alonzo (Alonzo) was terminated from her employment for the alleged misconduct of refusing to wear a smock in compliance with a company rule. The Employment Security Department (ESD) denied Alonzo unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct and therefore was disqualified under NMSA 1978, Section 51-1-7(B) (Repl.Pamp.1981). Alonzo appealed. All administrative review boards and the district court affirmed the decision to refuse benefits. We reverse.
The sole issue before this Court is whether one incident of refusing…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Duke City Lumber Co. v. New Mexico Environmental Improvement BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1984
- Coleman v. Department of LaborSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Boughton v. Division of Unemployment Insurance of Department of LaborSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
- Mitchell v. Lovington Good Samaritan Center, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fitzhugh v. New Mexico Department of Labor, Employment Security DivisionNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996
- Trujillo v. Employment Security DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rodman v. New Mexico Employment Security DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Cibola Energy Corp. v. RoselliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Sanchez v. New Mexico Department of LaborNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.