Clairol Incorporated v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board 1 granting the petition of appellee, Roux Laboratories, Inc., for cancellation of the registration 2 for the mark “PLATINUM PUFF” for a hair tinting, dyeing and coloring preparation. The petition was granted on the basis of appellee’s prior use of “PLATINUM PLUS” as a trademark for a haircoloring preparation.
Both parties filed stipulated testimony below together with accompanying exhibits. There is no dispute as to the asserted facts. These facts show that ap-pellee was the prior user of its mark, that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Application of Helene Curtis Industries, IncCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of the Belgrade Shoe CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- Myrurgia, S. A. v. Comptoir De La Parfumerie, S. A. Ancienne Maison TschanzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
3Cited by7 opinions
- AMF Inc. v. American Leisure Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Spice Islands, Inc. v. Frank Tea & Spice Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Chassis Master Corp. v. BorregoDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
- New England Fish Co. v. Hervin Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- Lone Star Manufacturing Co. v. Bill Beasley, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.