Legal Opinion

New England Fish Co. v. Hervin Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 27, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 74-549PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDWIN, Judge.

New England Fish Company, owner1 of the mark KITTY for cat food,2 appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board,3 dismissing its opposition to an application4 by The Hervin Company, to register the following mark for cat food:

Since there is no dispute that appellant is prior in use and that the goods of the parties are substantially the same, the sole issue is- whether BLUE MOUNTAIN KITTY O’S so resembles KITTY that concurrent use of the marks on the goods is likely to cause confusion, or mistake, or to deceive. 15 U.S.C. § 1052(d).

Appellant asserts that 15…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rockwood Chocolate Co., Inc. v. Hoffman Candy CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Clairol Incorporated v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. Food Specialty Co. v. Kal Kan Foods, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dan Robbins & Associates v. Questor Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Marker International v. deBrulerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1986
  3. Fiesta Palms, LLC, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2007
  4. Knight Textile Corp. v. Jones Investment Co., Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2005
  5. Supreme Steel Framing System Association, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API