Application of the Belgrade Shoe Company
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision 1 of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board rendered October 28, 1966 rejecting the application 2 of Belgrade Shoe Company for registration of its trademark COL“EE JUN S” as applied to women’s and girls’ shoes on the Principal Register. The examiner’s refusal is under section 2(d) of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. § 1052(d)), based on the registered mark COLLEGI-ENNE 3 as applied to shoes of leather, rubber, fabric and combinations, girls’ and junior girls’ hats, coats, suits, dresses, sweaters, skirts, and blouses.
The basis of rejection…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lilly Pulitzer, Inc. v. Lilli Ann CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Ernest Wilson v. Arthur J. DelaunayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re: Cordua Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- AMF Inc. v. American Leisure Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Stoncor Group, Inc. v. Specialty Coatings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Clairol Incorporated v. Roux Laboratories, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Sheraton Corp. of America v. Sheffield Watch, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.