Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Seiglar
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 1, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 19, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left her employment as an administrative coordinator for a university without good cause. The record establishes that, at her performance evaluation in July 2005, claimant was warned about her excessive absenteeism and tardiness.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Claim of ZerrilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of GoldbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Matter of Franklin (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of FollettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.