Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Zerrillo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 5, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1012It is well settled that quitting in response to criticism by a supervisor or in anticipation of discharge does not constitute good cause for leaving one’s employment (see Matter of Follett [Commissioner of Labor], 87 AD3d 1233, 1234 [2011]; Matter of Hull [Commissioner of Labor], 77 AD3d 1012, 1013 [2010]; Matter of Santiago [Commissioner of Labor], 308 AD2d 674 [2003]; Matter of Bradley [Hudacs], 190 AD2d 949, 950 [1993]). Based upon this record, we find that the Board’s decision that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause is supported by substantial evidence and must be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of HullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of SeiglarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of FollettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Franklin (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Matter of Walters (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Kanter (Commr. of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- In re the Claim of MarkajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of MarkajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.