Miller v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
Anthony Joseph Miller was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, namely, heroin. Punishment, enhanced by two previous convictions, was assessed by the jury at forty years’ confinement. In four points of error, appellant contends that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction; (2) the trial court erred in overruling the motion to suppress because the heroin was obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure; and (3) the instructions to the jury regarding the law of parole violated the constitutional provisions guaranteeing the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Deshong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Moraguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Oaks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.