Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided April 29, 1987No. 05-86-00089-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

Anthony Joseph Miller was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, namely, heroin. Punishment, enhanced by two previous convictions, was assessed by the jury at forty years’ confinement. In four points of error, appellant contends that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction; (2) the trial court erred in overruling the motion to suppress because the heroin was obtained as the result of an illegal search and seizure; and (3) the instructions to the jury regarding the law of parole violated the constitutional provisions guaranteeing the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  2. Deshong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Moraguez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  4. Oaks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Pelham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Scott v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  2. State v. McCarthyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API