Rose v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1DissentMcCORMICK, Judge
A Rose by any other name is a justly convicted appellant walking the streets of Texas with other guilty felons who will be released from the consequences of their convictions as a result of this decision. Today, the result oriented majority has produced a false flower of fairness camouflaged in the pseudonym of justice.
There is so much wrong with the majority opinion that to dissent in full would require the writing of at least a two volume treatise entitled “Judicial Legislation: A Means to an End.” Ignoring a constitutional amendment approved by the people of the State of Texas, the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.