Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1989No. 05-86-00089-CRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

KINKEADE, Justice.

Anthony Joseph Miller was convicted of possession of a controlled substance. Punishment, enhanced in the indictment by two previous convictions, was assessed by the jury at forty years’ confinement. On appeal to this Court, Miller contended that the trial court erred in submitting good time and parole instructions to the jury on the grounds that the charge was predicated upon an unconstitutional statute. We rejected this challenge to the constitutionality *492of article 37.07, section 4 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Haynie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  3. Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Howell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  5. Miller v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API