Herman v. Herman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Here, A. M.
Petitioner secured her final decree for divorce from the bond of matrimony in this suit on September 16th, 1929. 3STo order for alimony was made pending the suit or subsequent to the decree. Application for alimony was not made until the year 1931, and it was then referred to a special *128master to take proofs and report to the court whether in his judgment alimony should be ordered and if so in what sum. The master heard evidence and reported on May 15th, 1931, that in his opinion the defendant should be ordered to pay alimony in the sum of $15 per week. No exceptions were filed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935
- In re the appeal of BeamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1922
- Rinehart v. RinehartNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
- Rooney v. RooneySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
- MacDonnell v. VitilleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Vlaanderen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Bethell v. BethellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Flicker v. ChenitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Raymond v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Garlinger v. GarlingerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.