Legal Opinion

Williams v. Dale

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1932PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for malpractice against two physicians for the aggravation of an injury received by plaintiff while in the employ of a logging operator, both plaintiff and his employer being subject to the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act. The State Industrial Accident Commission assumed jurisdiction of the matter, and after the alleged negligent treatment by the physicians plaintiff was awarded compensation for permanent partial disability.

The complaint alleges, in effect, that on September 4, 1929, plaintiff was employed by Snellstrom Brothers and on that date plaintiff's…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ross v. Erickson Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Martin v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Polucha v. LandesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. McDonough v. National Hospital Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Thompson v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Fauver v. BellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API