Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 2, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Judge.

The defendant-appellant, Harry Armstrong, was convicted by a Davidson County Criminal Court jury of selling heroin, a Schedule I drug under the Tennessee Drug Control Act, T.C.A. § 52-1413(b)(10). He was sentenced to serve not less than ten nor more than fifteen years in the penitentiary and fined $18,000.00. Without challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain this conviction, Armstrong raises several assignments of error regarding procedural aspects of his trial. For the reasons set out below, we find that at least two of the alleged errors have adversely…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Carroll v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. TylerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Nipps v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. Jiminez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979
  4. State of Tennessee v. Anthony Eugene YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API