Legal Opinion

Nipps v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1981No. PC-80-685PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSSEY, Judge:

William Hulbert Nipps has appealed from an order of the District Court of Pontotoc County denying his application for postcon-viction relief in Pontotoc County Case No. CRF-77-9. For the reasons discussed below a new jury trial must be held for the purpose of setting the appellant’s sentence.

The appellant was convicted in Case No. CRF-77-9 of Knowingly Concealing Stolen Property After Two or More Felony Convictions. The possible imprisonment for a first offender is 0-1 year in the county jail or 0-5 years in prison, 1 but under the enhancement statute in effect at the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hicks v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Huffman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Thigpen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
  4. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  5. Depue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Glidewell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
  4. Joseph Arthur Carbray v. Ron Champion, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API