Legal Opinion

France v. France

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1995No. 94-225PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The only issue in this case arises from a disparate division of the property of the parties by the district court in granting a divorce. Gregory Alan France, the husband (husband), asserts the division of the property was so unequal an abuse of discretion by the district court is manifest from that fact alone. In order to magnify the disparate division, the husband also disputes the valuation assigned by the trial court to stock in a ranching corporation. The trial court set over to Kathie Sue France, the wife (wife), as her separate property the stock in the ranching…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Broadhead v. BroadheadWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Warren v. WarrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Kane v. KaneWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Wallop v. WallopWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Kelli Sue Williams v. Charles Leslie WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Odegard v. OdegardWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API