Legal Opinion
Metz v. Metz
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 13, 2003No. 02-110PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Albert V. Metz, Jr. (husband) appeals from the property distribution portion of a divorce decree awarding his ex-wife, Kathryn K. Metz, now known as Kathryn K. Karst (wife), part of his past and future disability insurance benefits. He also claims the trial court erred in presiding over the divorce trial after hearing evidence concerning the parties’ failed settlement mediation. We find no error and affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 2] The husband presents the following issues:
1. The trial court committed reversible error when it included [the husband’s] disability insurance benefits in the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Paul v. PaulWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Cline v. SawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Grosskopf v. GrosskopfWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Warren v. WarrenWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- TZ Land & Cattle Co. v. CondictWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Clh v. MmjWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Marriage of Staton v. StatonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
- Sweat v. SweatWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Hoffman v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.