Odegard v. Odegard
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶1] Appellant, Michael Duane Odegard (husband), seeks review of the district court's divoree decree, which ended the marriage between him and Appellee, Brenda Kay Ode-gard (wife). Husband claims that the district court: Erred in the division of the marital property; used inadmissible evidence in valuing property subject to division; failed to admit evidence pertinent to the property division; erred in awarding attorney's fees to wife; made mathematical errors in computing the property division; erred in requiring husband to pay 7% interest on the unpaid portion of the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Hendrickson v. HendricksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
- Mayland v. FlitnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Kinstler v. RTB SOUTH GREELEY, LTD. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Hoffman v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kelli Sue Williams v. Charles Leslie WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.