Legal Opinion

Odegard v. Odegard

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2003No. 02-138PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Michael Duane Odegard (husband), seeks review of the district court's divoree decree, which ended the marriage between him and Appellee, Brenda Kay Ode-gard (wife). Husband claims that the district court: Erred in the division of the marital property; used inadmissible evidence in valuing property subject to division; failed to admit evidence pertinent to the property division; erred in awarding attorney's fees to wife; made mathematical errors in computing the property division; erred in requiring husband to pay 7% interest on the unpaid portion of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Metz v. MetzWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hendrickson v. HendricksonWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hinckley v. HinckleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mayland v. FlitnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mueller v. ZimmerWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kinstler v. RTB SOUTH GREELEY, LTD. LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hoffman v. HoffmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kelli Sue Williams v. Charles Leslie WilliamsWyoming Supreme Court · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API