Legal Opinion

Application of Heritage (Two Cases)

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 28, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5665, 5666PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

Appellant separately appeals from two decisions by the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming decisions of the Primary Examiner, finally rejecting all of the claims, 52 to 55, inclusive, 68, 70 and 74 to 81, inclusive, of an application, serial No. 294,212, filed September 9, 1939, “For Insulation of Confined Spaces,” and all of the claims, 21 to 27, inclusive, of an application, serial No. 477,-751, filed March 2, 1943, as a continuation-in-part of the former application.

For the reason that the appeals bear such close relationship, they will be decided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton Laboratories, Inc. v. MassengillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. In re O'ConnorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  3. In Re StauberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. Therm-O-Proof Insulation Co. v. Slayter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
  3. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1956
  4. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Martin-Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1972
  5. National Latex Products Company v. Sun Rubber Company, Akron Presform Mold Company v. Sun Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API