Legal Opinion
In Re Stauber
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 19, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2551PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
The appellant filed his application March 3,1921, for claimed improvements in gas turbines and like machines. Accompanying his application was a very extensive specification, covering 17 pages in the printed record. Attached thereto were 27 drawings of appellant’s device, showing it in many forms and ways. The Examiner on June 25, 1921, required new drawings to comply with the requirements of the rules of the practice of the Patent Office. A new oath was also required, and a revision of the specification. The Examiner made the following statement in his letter: “At…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- The Incandescent Lamp PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States Ex Rel. Steinmetz v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Myers v. FeigelmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
- In re HOWARTHCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
- General Electric Company v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Application of GartnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.