Therm-O-Proof Insulation Co. v. Slayter & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Patentee was most unfortunate in wording his claim. He entitled his patent “Method of Heat Insulating.” His first claim starts with these words: “The method of building a wall whereby to increase the insulating and fire resisting properties thereof.” From these two statements it is assumed that his was a process patent. The first paragraph of the specifications confirms this conclusion, for the inventor there says:
“This invention relates to method for heat insulating buildings and the like and refers more particularly to an improved process by means of which houses or…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
3Cited by11 opinions
- Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Coltman v. Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Slayter & Co. v. Stebbins-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Application of Heritage (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- National Theatre Supply Co. v. Da-Lite Screen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.