Legal Opinion

Texas & N. O. R. v. Dingfelder & Balish, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 23, 1938No. 10251PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This suit was brought by 'Dingfelder & Balish, Inc., against Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company and the Southern Pacific Steamship Lines for damages to a shipment of twenty-nine carloads of onions from Floresville and Poth, Tex., by rail via the first named defendant’s line to Galveston, and by boat via the second named defendant’s line, to New York City. The plaintiff below recovered of the railroad company, as the initial carrier, which has appealed.

The shipment was made on a through bill of lading issued by the railroad company at point of origin. The evidence was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Ewing, Ind. Exs. v. Wm. L. Foley, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Settegast v. TimminsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Texas & New Orleans Railroad v. Dingfelder & Balish, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Gulf Oil Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Resolute Insurance Co. v. Morgan Drive-Away, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Martin v. E. A. McCabe & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  5. Tucker v. NewthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API