Kutz v. Koury Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
The question here is whether the trial court properly granted defendant’s motion for directed verdict following the jury’s inability to return a unanimous verdict. We find that defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law and affirm.
Rule 50(b)(1) provides that if a party moved for directed verdict at the close of all the evidence, he may move for judgment in accordance with his motion if a jury verdict is not returned. “[T]he motion shall be granted if it appears that the motion for directed verdict could properly have been granted.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50. Defendant in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Lincoln Operating Co. v. GillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
- Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jones v. AbnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Wotzka v. Minndakota Limited PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Goynias v. Spa Health Clubs, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Pulley v. Rex HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Simpson v. CottonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.