Lusk v. Swanson
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Marita Lusk appeals the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of appellee-defendant James D. Swanson, M.D. Specifically, Lusk contends that the trial court erred in determining that her claims were barred by the statute of limitations and that she had failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence. In addition, Lusk contends that the trial court erred in not granting summary judgment in her favor.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the non-moving party are that Lusk fell and injured herself on August 18, 1996. Subsequently, Dr. Swanson, an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Guinn v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Culbertson v. MernitzIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kho v. PenningtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Booth v. WileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Syfu v. QuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Munsell v. HambrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- McIntosh v. CumminsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.