Legal Opinion
United States v. Clarence Buck
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 1, 2017No. 15-20697PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants Clarence Bernard Buck and Kendal Allen (collectively “defendants”) were charged with various crimes, including robbery in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a). They proceeded to jury trial, but three days into it the district court granted their motions for a mistrial. At the conclusion of the second jury trial, Buck and Allen were convicted on all counts. Buck was sentenced to 1,846 months of imprisonment, and Allen was sentenced to 1,435 months. They now appeal, contending that the retrial of their case violated their constitutional…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Irma Ovalles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Monico DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Antonyo ReeceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Maurice DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Marcus WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.