Legal Opinion

Mercantile Investment Co. v. How

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1929No. Docket No. 3758PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

Plaintiff and appellant Mercantile Investment Company, a corporation, brought this action to quiet title to a tract of land situate. in the town of “Hollydale, ” Los Angeles County. An answer was filed by the defendants and respondents T. J. V. How and Mary E. How, his wife, in which they alleged that they had an interest in said real property consisting of a lien thereon for the sum of $1163.60, which sum they had paid to appellant on account of the purchase price of said property. The answer further alleged that the contract theretofore entered, into between…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Gjurich v. FiegCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Ballard v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hicks v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Gold v. PhelanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kast v. Dubuque Fire & Marine InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API