Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Valk

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Before Norton, J.-, Charleston, July, 1888. The opinion fully states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice McGowan.

This was a proceeding to enforce a mechanic’s lien, and as several preliminary questions were *263raised, principally as to forms of procedure, it will contribute to clearness to make a short statement; and that of the appellant is substantially adopted.

The plaintiff filed his .petition, alleging that in pursuance of an agreement made with the defendant, he had built a house for her on a lot in Charleston ; that he had done certain extra work, and had been to extra expense, because of the effects of the earthquake, which the defendant…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Noisette v. IsmailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Stone & Clamp, General Contractors v. HOLMESSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Tenney v. Anderson Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  5. Harvey v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API