Murphy v. Valk
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Norton, J.-, Charleston, July, 1888. The opinion fully states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mr. Justice McGowan.
This was a proceeding to enforce a mechanic’s lien, and as several preliminary questions were *263raised, principally as to forms of procedure, it will contribute to clearness to make a short statement; and that of the appellant is substantially adopted.
The plaintiff filed his .petition, alleging that in pursuance of an agreement made with the defendant, he had built a house for her on a lot in Charleston ; that he had done certain extra work, and had been to extra expense, because of the effects of the earthquake, which the defendant…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Noisette v. IsmailCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
- Stone & Clamp, General Contractors v. HOLMESSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Tenney v. Anderson Water, Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
- Harvey v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.