Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 14, 1940No. 15101PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The respondent obtained a judgment against the appellant, J. Harold Smith, in the sum of $425.00 actual damages, and $425.00 punitive damages, growing out of an action for slander. The defendant is' appealing from this judgment upon numerous exceptions.

The gist of the action is found in the allegations of Paragraph 2 of the complaint, which we here quote: “That on or about June 1, 1938, while the defendant was conducting a religious service before a great audience in Hendersonville, North Carolina, and contriving and maliciously…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrattonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Duncan v. the Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Jenkins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
  4. Gattis v. Kilgo.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Hartsfield v. Harvey C. Hines Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Murray, v. Holnam, Inc. and Thomas Thornton, of Whom Holnam, Inc. IsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  2. DE LEON CASTELLANOS v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. Abofreka v. Alston Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Hainer v. American Medical International, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Mellen v. LaneCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API