Legal Opinion

Department of Social & Health Services v. Dabbagh

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 18, 2016No. Nos. 73055-0-I; 73056-8-I; 73057-6-I; 73157-2-I; 73158-1-I; 73159-9-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTrickey, J.

¶1 — Ibtissam Nakalji and Mohammed Dabbagh appeal the termination of their parental rights. Nakalji argues that the trial court denied her due process by excluding her from the courtroom while her son testified. We hold that the trial court adequately protected Nakalji’s due process rights by allowing her attorney and guardian ad litem to remain in the courtroom during the testimony and granting a recess to confer with her before cross-examination. We affirm the trial court’s decision to termi*449nate her parental rights because substantial evidence supported its findings.

¶2 Dabbagh challenges…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  5. City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re The Dependency Of: J.d.p. And J.d.p.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  2. Brennan Heating And Air Conditioning, Resp v. Jeffrey M. Mcmeel, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. In Re The Dependency Of L.a.h., Kautia Hopkins, App. V. DcyfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. In Re The Dependency Of: M.h. Dmitriy Timpanidi, App. v. State Of Wa., Dcyf, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. In re Dependency of A.D.Washington Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API