Legal Opinion

In Re Welfare of JM

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 22, 2005No. 23594-7-IIIPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

125 P.3d 245 (2005)

130 Wash.App. 912

In re the WELFARE OF J.M.

No. 23594-7-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three, Panel One.

December 22, 2005.

Susan M. Gasch, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Lisa L. Simonsen, Attorney at Law, Washington State Attorney General's Office, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

¶ 1 A parent faced with the prospect of termination of parental rights to his or her child is entitled to a meaningful hearing, and that includes effective representation of counsel. The rights at stake are both fundamental and constitutional. Here, a mother's lawyer…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  2. Ramsey v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  3. State v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  4. Department of Social & Health Services v. ParvinWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re RgbHawaii Supreme Court · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API