Legal Opinion

Kelsay v. Kelsay Land Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 12, 1917No. 5632PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Carter County; 5. H. Russell, Judge. Action by Newton Kelsay against the Kel-say Land Company and W. P. Terrell. Judgment for defendant Terrell, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

Newton Kelsay, as plaintiff, commenced this action against Kelsay Land Company and W. P. Terrell to recover a balance of $43,984.11 due upon a certain promissory note executed by the Kelsay Land Company, and for 5 per cent, of said amount as attorney’s fees, and to foreclose a lien upon certain lands which it was alleged had been given by defendant Terrell to secure the payment of said sum. The note was not signed by defendant Terrell. The defendants answered, pleading, among other defenses, the bar of the statute of limitations and that the consideration for said note had failed. Upon issues…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ringo v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Whittington v. FlintSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Patterson v. RousneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Millington v. Hill, Fontaine & Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  5. Stephens v. ShannonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grayson v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Eichman v. CulverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Rowe v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Foreman v. MarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Harris v. GraysonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API