Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. Lewis

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 22, 1938No. 7020PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Associate Justice.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action for false arrest and imprisonment. The sole question is whether the District Court erred in refusing to direct a verdict for the defendant. Defendant’s contention is that there was no sufficient evidence to support a finding that it procured plaintiff’s arrest.

A watch and chain were stolen from one of defendant’s buildings, and an overcoat from another. Plaintiff, a former janitor in one of the buildings, was thought to have been recently about the premises. He was arrested without a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Farnam v. . FeeleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Cieplinski v. SevernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Takahashi v. Hecht Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1931
  5. Bright v. PattonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mohammad Sami v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  2. Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Hammargren v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Margaret S. Rodriguez v. Donald E. RitcheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. Stueber v. Admiral Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API