Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.

delivered tie opinion of tie court.

Tie judgment wiici tiis writ of error is brougit to reverse was one of nil capiat and for costs rendered against tie corporation plaintiff in error iere and plaintiff below, in a suit brougit by it against tie defendant corporation in tie Superior Court.

Tie plaintiff was attempting to recover from the defendant tie sum of $973.51 and interest on a contract for a special rebate on tie purchase of certain fire arms wiici plaintiff purchased from tie defendant in 1904.

Tie defendant contended below and contends iere that no binding contract for such a rebate was…