Legal Opinion

Tipton v. Schuler

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 27, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action in Case, under the dram-shop act. Error to the Circuit Court of McLean County; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harker

Plaintiff in error brought suit under the dram-shop act against Henry Schuler, a saloon keeper, and Amos Hut-ledge, the owner of the building in which the saloon was kept, to recover for injuries to her means of support occasioned by the selling to her husband of liquor, whereby he became intoxicated and sat down upon the railroad track of the C., C., C. & St. L. R. R. Co., where he was injured by' being struck by a passing train. There was a trial by jury resulting in a finding and judgment in favor of the defendants.

The only ground upon which a reversal is asked, is the error of the court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. O'KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Schmidt v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Nason v. LetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Daubach v. Drake Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1927
  3. Matkins v. FenorskyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1952
  4. Shea v. LaCostAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API