Rayette-Faberge, Inc. v. John Oster Manufacturing Co.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
MYRON L. GORDON, District Judge.
There are presently before the court four separate motions relating to the production of documents under rule 34. One such motion has been brought by the plaintiff, and three motions have been made by the defendant. Since all motions are related in concept, they will all be resolved in this decision.
Opposing counsel have met and made an attempt to resolve their disagreements *526relative to discovery, and the present motions reflect the residual disagreements.
The disclosure of a few of the documents in question is resisted on the basis of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kearney & Trecker Corp. v. Giddings & Lewis, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1969
3Cited by8 opinions
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977
- Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Golden Trade v. Lee Apparel Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.