Legal Opinion

Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 20, 1982No. 80 C 6747PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

In this patent infringement action defendant Barber-Greene Company (“Barber-Greene”) seeks an order under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 37(a) requiring production of four letters in the possession of plaintiff Robert Mendenhall (“Mendenhall”) or his lawyer Jerry R. Seiler (“Seiler”). 1 Its motion poses questions whether:(1) three communications from Seiler on Mendenhall’s behalf to foreign patent agents (not themselves lawyers) processing Mendenhall’s foreign patent applications are privileged; and(2) as to all four letters, whether Mendenhall has…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  3. The Permian Corporation and Occidental Petroleum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Burlington Industries v. Exxon Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  5. Transamerica Computer Company, Inc., and v. International Business MacHines Corporation, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. People v. WagenerIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ralph L. Gray, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. O. Gene Bicknell, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Credit Lyonnais (Suisse) S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Chubb Integrated Systems Ltd. v. National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1984
  5. In Re Christus Spohn Hospital KlebergTexas Supreme Court · 2007

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API