Legal Opinion

Hights v. International Harvester Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 9, 1987No. 86 C 1771PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

Patricia Hights (“Hights”) has sued Nav-istar International Transportation Corp. (“Navistar”), 1 alleging racial discrimination (Hights is black) in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5 (“Title VII”) as well as breach of contract. Navistar has moved for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. 2 For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, Navistar’s motion is granted in its entirety.

Facts 3

In late January 1984 4 Hights interviewed for a legal secretary position with Navistar. During…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meiri v. DaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Estella Timms v. Anthony M. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Cox v. Electronic Data Systems Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  3. Moore v. Nutrasweet Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
  4. Miller v. State of Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
  5. United States v. One 1985 Bmw 318i, Vin Wbaac8401f0685314District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API