Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1985 Bmw 318i, Vin Wbaac8401f0685314

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 20, 1988No. 87 C 3208PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SHADUR, District Judge.

In this in rem proceeding, the United States seeks the forfeiture of a 1985 BMW automobile (the “BMW”) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(4). 2 Stella Ifueko Ajibade (“Stella”), the owner of the BMW, has filed a claim in opposition to the forfeiture. Both the government and Stella have now moved for summary judgment under Fed. R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 56. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order both motions are denied.

Facts 3

Forfeiture of the BMW was occasioned by the arrest and later conviction of Stella’s husband Michael Kolawole…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re Forfeiture of $53Michigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. United States v. 8848 South Commercial St., Chicago, Ill.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  3. United States v. AragonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. One 1989 Stratford Fairmont 14' X 70' Mobile HomeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
  5. City of Daytona Beach v. BushDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API