Legal Opinion

Maples v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1909No. 4173PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of arson, and his punishment assessed at five years confinement in the State penitentiary.

In the main charge the court submits the following charge on the question of accomplice: “A conviction can not be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, nor any number of accomplices, unless the jury first believes the accomplice’s evidence is true, and that it shows, or tends to show, defendant is guilty; and then you can not convict unless the accomplice’s testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  2. Barrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Newman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Hinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
  5. Tate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  2. Goodwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Snelling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
  5. Ross v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API