Ross v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant was convicted for unlawfully selling intoxicating liquors in Montague County, after prohibition was in force therein, and his penalty fixed at two years in the penitentiary.
One ground of his motion for new trial is that the verdict is insufficient in that the only testimony against him is that of J. H. W. J ones, whose testimony is insufficient in that it shows him to be wholly unreliable and unworthy of belief and that he is a biased witness with no stability or reliability, his statement being wholly unreliable and contradictory and unworthy of credit.
Said…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Sue v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1907
- Leeper v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
- Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- McCaleb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- People v. McGovernIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. BondsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.