Legal Opinion
Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. Russell
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided February 25, 1999No. 951726-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILKINS, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 Coulter & Smith, Ltd. (Coulter) appeals the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of Roger Russell, Roger Richards and Kristen Russell Russell. We reverse in part and remand for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 This matter comes before us pursuant to a remand from the Utah Supreme Court. A more complete statement of the facts giving rise to this dispute is contained in Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. Russell, 966 P.2d 852 (Utah 1998) (Coulter II).
¶ 3 The relevant facts are as follows: Coulter and Russell owned adjacent parcels of property in Salt Lake County.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coulter & Smith, Ltd. v. RussellUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Themy v. Seagull Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
- Coombs v. OuzounianUtah Supreme Court · 1970
- A.C. Financial, Inc. v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Calder v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1954
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Holmes Development, LLC v. CookUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- McArthur v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- MediaNews Group, Inc. v. McCartheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Estate of Smith v. SamuelsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2002
- Regal Realsource v. EnlawCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.