Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Pyle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1928No. File No. 6713PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbedd, J.

The counties of Faulk, Potter, and' Dewey, in this state, constitute the Thirty-sixth senatorial district, entitled under section 5076, Rev. Code 1919, to elect one state senator. At the November, 19.26, general election the total votes cast in said senatorial district for the Republican candidate for Governor were 2,721. Therefore, by virtue of section 7120, Rev. Code 1919, as amended by chapter 113, Daws 1927, in order to place upon the ballot to be used- by the Republican party at the oncoming May primary the name of a candidate for selection at such primary as the Republican party nominee…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hotchkiss v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. O'Brien v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Lucas v. RingsrudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Reynolds v. Narragansett Electric Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1904
  5. Harris v. KingSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burns v. KurtenbachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Cheney v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Shields v. WellsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Putnam v. PyleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State Ex Rel. Jacobsen v. MorrisonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API