Wilson v. Alpena County Road Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.
Plaintiffs 1 appeal by right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to defendant after it found that plaintiffs were alleging a dangerous or defective road design that was outside the scope of defendant’s duty, and that a punctured tire, rather than a pothole, could have caused plaintiffs injuries. Because plaintiffs did not allege defective design and because the court made findings of fact by dismissing the case on the ground that a punctured tire rather than a pothole could have caused plaintiff Diane Wilson’s bicycle accident, we reverse and remand.
Plaintiff contends…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lindsey Patrick v. Virginia B TurkelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wilson v. Alpena County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- LaMeau v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
- Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.