Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Alpena County Road Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2004No. Docket 243357PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorrello, J.

Plaintiffs 1 appeal by right from the trial court’s order granting summary disposition to defendant after it found that plaintiffs were alleging a dangerous or defective road design that was outside the scope of defendant’s duty, and that a punctured tire, rather than a pothole, could have caused plaintiffs injuries. Because plaintiffs did not allege defective design and because the court made findings of fact by dismissing the case on the ground that a punctured tire rather than a pothole could have caused plaintiff Diane Wilson’s bicycle accident, we reverse and remand.

Plaintiff contends…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Skinner v. Square D Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Wade v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lindsey Patrick v. Virginia B TurkelsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Wilson v. Alpena County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. LaMeau v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Costa v. Community Emergency Medical Services, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API