Brookins v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
Defendant appeals from a conviction for robbery in the second degree on several grounds, the most significant of which involves references to “mug shots” during the course of the trial. As used herein, the term means police photographs. 1
I
The use of police photographs at trial risks suggesting to the jury that defendant has a prior criminal record. While our trial procedure is based on the premise that the jury will follow instructions and decide a case only on the pertinent evidence, it is eesential that jurors be insulated as much as possible from the irrelevant, particularly…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Milton v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robert E. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LazoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- McNair v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Banther v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Bowe v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.