Bowe v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
In this appeal from his conviction for second degree attempted robbery and resisting arrest, the defendant claims that he was denied due process of law by prosecu-torial misconduct in the form of impermissible cross-examination at trial. We agree that, in one respect, the prosecutor’s cross-examination infringed upon the defendant’s right to post-arrest silence and accordingly reverse the conviction and remand for a new trial.
I
The facts underlying the charges against the defendant are not complicated. The complaining witness, John McClendon, an elderly man who was personally acquainted with…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. HaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fletcher v. WeirSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wainwright v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Brokenbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
- Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Weddington v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.