Legal Opinion

Marshall v. City of Providence

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided October 18, 1993No. 92-666-AppealPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter was before the Supreme Court pursuant to an order issued to the plaintiff to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case plaintiffs have appealed from an order in the Superior Court granting defendant City of Providence’s motion for summary judgment. In doing so the Superior Court ruled that plaintiffs notice to the city of injuries suffered because of a defect in the sidewalk was insufficient under G.L.1956 (1991 Reenactment) § 45-15-9 as a matter of law.

After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barroso v. PepinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  2. Batchelder v. WhiteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1907
  3. Maloney v. CookSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1899
  4. Hareld v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moseley v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  2. Prout v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
  3. Mushnick v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  4. Morales v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Natareno v. MartinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API