Legal Opinion

Hareld v. Napolitano

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided November 16, 1992No. 91-309-AppealPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHEA, Justice.

In this matter the plaintiff appeals from the granting of the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in the Superior Court. This law suit arose out of a slip and fall resulting in injuries to the plaintiff, Barbara Hareld, caused by an accumulation of snow and ice on a city-owned sidewalk in the city of Providence. We affirm.

General Laws 1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 24-5-14 requires that the cities and towns provide for ice and snow removal from public highways and sidewalks. The statute also provides that nothing in that section shall be construed to make the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Kennedy v. Cumberland Engineering Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. King v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Touhey v. City of DecaturIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Randolph v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1923

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  2. Ramos v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1993
  3. Connor v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  4. State v. AlmonteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  5. State v. AlmonteSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API