Moseley v. Fitzgerald
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
These consolidated cases came before the Supreme Court on May 17, 2001, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. The plaintiffs, Melissa M. Moseley, Robert F. Moseley, Robert F. Moseley and Mary Jane Moseley 1 (plaintiffs), have appealed a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants, the City of East Providence (city or defendants), and New England Telephone and Telegraph Company 2 (Verizon or defendants). 3 After hearing the arguments of counsel and reviewing the memoranda submitted…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Rotelli v. CatanzaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Ferreira v. StrackSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
- Marr Scaffolding Co., Inc. v. Fairground Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Woodland Manor III Associates v. KeeneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by10 opinions
- IDC Properties, Inc. v. Goat Island South Condominium Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2015
- McNulty v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Prout v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- Wallace v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
- Fiore v. Town of South KingstownSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.