Legal Opinion

Houston v. Comm'rs of Cloud County

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

M'ror from Cloud District Court. Action by Houston, against the commissioners and treasurer of Cloud county, to restrain the assignment and transfer of certain tax-sale certificates and to set aside the treasurer’s sale for taxes upon which such certificates were based. The district court gave judgment in favor of defendants, at October Term 1875, and plaintiff brings the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

It is understood that the same questions are presented in this case as in that of Hagaman v. Comm’rs *397of Cloud Co., just decided, {ante, p.394,) with the exception that on the trial of this cause, the plaintiff Houston demanded a jury, and his claim being denied, he makes the refosal of a jury trial an additional ground of error. But this point is settled against such claim by the decision in the case of McCardell v. McNay, 17 Kas. 433. The judgment in this case is therefore affirmed upon the authority of Hagaman’s case, supra, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCardell v. McNaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Rich v. BowkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  3. Parker v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Cole v. DrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Keith v. KeithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API